The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 709

Advocacy and Policy Change, pre-publication manuscript of Lobbying and Policy Change (19 July 2008)

Exhibit 709 ยท Pre-publication book manuscript

Advocacy and Policy Change, pre-publication manuscript of Lobbying and Policy Change (19 July 2008)

If the wealthy are so certain to win, they should already have won in a previous iteration of the process.

Draft pagination, not the printed book. Reports 214 'sides' on 98 issues and 2,221 advocates (23 per case). Chapter 1 reasons that existing policy already reflects past power, so lobbying outcomes depend on changes in mobilization, not levels. Chapter 10 Table 10.5: the side with more resources won between 45 and 56 percent of the time, with no statistically significant relationship. The same chapter calls the status-quo equilibrium 'quite unfair' in many cases.

Source
Baumgartner, Berry, Hojnacki, Kimball and Leech (manuscript hosted by the authors)
Date
19 July 2008
Quoted from
draft Chapter 1, p. 32
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://fbaum.unc.edu/books/lobby/Advocacy_July_19_2008.pdf
Accessed
2026-11-09
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding POL-2.13
Peer-reviewed Baumgartner and colleagues studied 98 issues drawn from interviews with registered lobbyists and report that 60 percent of lobbying campaigns failed to change policy. Measured resources explain less than 5 percent of the difference between successful and unsuccessful efforts.