The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 1161

The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups

Exhibit 1161 ยท Academic book (primary theory text)

The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups

Indeed, unless the number of individuals in a group is quite small, or unless there is coercion or some other special device to make individuals act in their common interest, rational, self-interested individuals will not act to achieve their common or group interests.

States that rational, self-interested members of a large group will not voluntarily act for the group interest absent coercion or selective incentives, and that small groups with concentrated stakes organize more easily and can shift burdens onto larger members. Chapter I sorts groups into privileged, intermediate and latent. Text read in a 20th-printing scan (copyright 1965 and 1971 editions) on an Internet Archive user upload; the publisher record is the DOI.

Source
Mancur Olson, Harvard University Press (Harvard Economic Studies vol. 124)
Date
1965
Quoted from
Introduction, p. 2 (20th printing, 2002). Same book, ch. I section D, p. 36: "the larger the group, the less it will further its common interests."
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041660
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit
Note
Standing note: robust as logic, contested as a predictor. Olson himself limits it to groups without selective incentives; Baumgartner et al. 2009 (exhibit baumgartner-2009-lobbying-policy-change) found organized interests often fail, so cite Olson for who organizes and not for who wins. Quote was OCR text; one OCR artifact (ra'tional) corrected.

Cited by

No published finding cites this exhibit.