The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 1046

Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis (doctoral thesis summary)

Exhibit 1046 ยท Research paper (not peer reviewed)

Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis (doctoral thesis summary)

The Gini coefficient (as well as other well-known inequality metrics) shows that less than 10% of the total number of logged editors in each language version is performing more than 90% of the total number of edits.

Quantitative analysis of logged-in authors in the ten largest Wikipedia language editions. Per-author edit counts follow Pareto-like distributions; the inequality analysis reports that less than 10% of logged editors per language version make more than 90% of edits, with monthly Gini coefficients of 80 to 85% since 2004. The companion HICSS 2008 paper (Ortega, Gonzalez-Barahona and Robles, doi 10.1109/HICSS.2008.333) was not read. Logged-in authors only; anonymous edits and bots are outside the analysis.

Source
Felipe Ortega, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Date
29 July 2009
Quoted from
Section on inequality of the distribution of edits among authors, p. 8
Grade
Primary record
Document
https://www.gwern.net/doc/wikipedia/2009-ortega.pdf
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit
Note
Sentence spans a line break in the source PDF.

Cited by

No published finding cites this exhibit.