The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 708

Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans

Exhibit 708 ยท Peer-reviewed article

Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans

We find that they are extremely active politically and that they are much more conservative than the American public as a whole with respect to important policies concerning taxation, economic regulation, and especially social welfare programs.

Pilot interview survey of wealthy Chicago-area residents in 2011 (NORC interviewers): 104 interviews in all, 83 in the refined sample drawn from the Wealthfinder 'rank A' list (about the top 4 percent of wealth-holding households) narrowed toward the top 1 percent; response rate 37 percent; mean wealth $14,006,338, median $7,500,000; mean income $1,040,140. 58 percent identified as Republican and 27 percent as Democrat (leaners included). Wealthy Democrats were more conservative on economic issues than Democrats in the general public, and wealth and party had independent effects. It measures preferences and political activity, not policy outcomes. The authors warn of sampling error in a small pilot confined to one metropolitan area and offer the rival reading that wealthy preferences may reflect better information. Read from the Northwestern-hosted PDF.

Source
Benjamin I. Page, Larry M. Bartels and Jason Seawright, Perspectives on Politics 11(1), pp. 51-73
Date
March 2013
Quoted from
Abstract, p. 51
Grade
Peer-reviewed
Document
https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271200360X
Accessed
2026-11-09
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding POL-2.14
Peer-reviewed Page, Bartels and Seawright interviewed 104 wealthy Chicago-area residents in 2011 and found them much more conservative than the general public on taxation, economic regulation and social welfare. Of the respondents, 58 percent identified as Republican and 27 percent as Democratic, leaners included.
Finding POL-2.15
Open question The Gilens-Page elite coefficient attaches to the 90th income percentile, about $146,000 in household income. No cited source measures the policy preferences of the top 1 percent across issues and years, so the effect cannot be assigned to the very rich.