The Lacuna Project

lacuna (n.) a gap in a record where something should be

Independent research. Not affiliated with any government, agency, or company.

Exhibit 1040

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220, Daily Mail RfC (closing statement)

Exhibit 1040 ยท Policy page

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220, Daily Mail RfC (closing statement)

Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.

A request for comment opened on 7 January 2017 closed on 8 February 2017 with a statement by three-plus volunteer closers that the Daily Mail is generally unreliable and generally prohibited as a reference. The closing statement summarizes the support arguments (poor fact checking, sensationalism, fabrication) and the three opposing arguments, and says a second RfC upheld the result in 2019. The Daily Mail entry on the perennial-sources page states that it was the first source to be deprecated. Contributor names are omitted here.

Source
English Wikipedia (reliable sources noticeboard; request for comment closed by volunteer editors)
Date
8 February 2017
Quoted from
Archive top, result
Grade
Primary record
Document
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_220#Daily_Mail_RfC
Accessed
2026-11-10
Cited by
Findings citing this exhibit

Cited by

Finding INF-3.9
Primary record A request for comment closed by volunteers on 8 February 2017 concluded that the Daily Mail is generally unreliable and its use as a reference generally prohibited, and the perennial-sources page's Daily Mail entry states that it was the first source to be deprecated. The page's definition of Deprecated in an archive capture of 17 January 2019 allows a deprecated source to be cited as a primary source when it is the topic of discussion, and the capture of 1 October 2026 does not carry that clause.